Start with one physical shipment journey
Forget the three-letter abbreviations for a moment. A normal export can move through seller packing, export clearance, pickup, origin terminal, main carriage, destination terminal, import clearance, final delivery and unloading. Incoterms® allocates specified responsibilities around that physical chain.
The named place or port is part of the rule. ‘FCA’ is incomplete. ‘FCA ICD Tughlakabad, New Delhi, Incoterms® 2020’ tells the parties where the agreed delivery point sits. The same rule with a different named place can shift cost, loading and operational responsibility.
Goods, export packing and possible loading point.
Truck/rail movement to carrier, ICD, CFS or port.
Seller handles this under most rules except EXW practical allocation.
Air, road, rail, multimodal or sea freight.
Terminal/port and onward delivery.
Importer formalities, duties/taxes, warehouse and unloading.
Always draw two lines: the cost line and the risk line
The biggest Incoterms® mistake is assuming the party that pays freight also carries risk until that freight destination. C-rules prove why that is wrong: the seller pays main carriage to the named destination, but risk transfers earlier at the origin-side delivery point.
When reviewing a quote, literally write two rows—‘seller pays until’ and ‘risk transfers at’. If the team cannot fill both rows confidently, the three-letter rule is not yet understood.
Risk transfers here under CPT/CIP or CFR/CIF.
Seller has contracted/paid freight onward.
Cost destination is reached later; it is not automatically the risk point.
Seven rules work for any mode or multimodal transport
EXW, FCA, CPT, CIP, DAP, DPU and DDP can be used for road, rail, air, courier, containerized sea movement and multimodal chains. The operational choice depends on the actual handover, main-carriage control, insurance requirement and destination/import responsibilities.
Four rules are for sea/inland-waterway vessel delivery
FAS, FOB, CFR and CIF use delivery concepts around the vessel and ports. They are not simply ‘ocean shipment rules’ for every container movement. When a sealed container is delivered to a carrier/terminal before the exporter controls actual vessel loading, FCA/CPT/CIP often describe the real handover more naturally.
For bulk, breakbulk or other transactions where alongside/on-board vessel delivery is genuinely controlled and evidenced, the sea rules can align well with operations.
All 11 rules in plain operational language
Use this table after the diagrams. The purpose is to connect each abbreviation to a physical handover and a commercial caution, not to replace the official ICC rule text.
| Rule | Use when… | Risk transfers… | Seller typically pays… | Watch this |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EXW | Buyer truly can collect from named seller place and handle export-side responsibilities | When goods are placed at buyer's disposal at named place | Minimal transport obligations | Cross-border export clearance/loading practicality often makes FCA safer |
| FCA | Buyer controls main carriage; seller can deliver to carrier/terminal and export-clear | At named FCA delivery point | Origin obligations through delivery/export clearance | State seller premises vs another place because loading differs |
| CPT | Seller should contract/pay carriage but buyer takes transit risk after carrier handover | At delivery to first/agreed carrier | Carriage to named destination | Freight destination ≠ risk destination |
| CIP | CPT structure plus seller-arranged cargo insurance | At carrier handover | Carriage + rule-required insurance | Confirm cover/value and claims practicality |
| DAP | Seller should carry delivery risk to named destination but buyer imports/unloads | At destination ready for unloading | Transport to destination | Buyer handles import clearance/duties |
| DPU | Seller should deliver and unload at destination | After seller unloads at named destination | Transport + unloading | Seller needs operational control/capability to unload |
| DDP | Seller can legally/practically import-clear and bear destination duties/taxes | At destination ready for unloading | Transport + import obligations | High legal/tax/registration complexity for foreign seller |
| FAS | Goods are genuinely delivered alongside a vessel | Alongside vessel at origin port | Origin through alongside delivery | Sea/inland-waterway only |
| FOB | Seller genuinely controls/evidences on-board vessel delivery | On board vessel | Origin through onboard delivery | Container terminal handover may fit FCA better |
| CFR | Seller pays sea freight but on-board origin risk transfer is intended | On board at origin | Sea freight to destination port | Cost and risk split |
| CIF | CFR structure plus seller-arranged marine insurance | On board at origin | Sea freight + rule-required insurance | Containerized multimodal chain may point to CIP |
Scenario 1: container from India handed at an ICD before vessel loading
An exporter in India loads a sealed container and hands it to the buyer's nominated carrier at an inland container depot. The buyer controls the ocean booking. The exporter cannot practically point to the exact moment the container is placed on board the vessel.
FOB may be familiar commercial language, but the physical delivery event is carrier handover at the ICD. FCA [exact ICD] is therefore a rule to evaluate because the named delivery point matches the evidence the exporter actually controls.
Seller-controlled activity.
Seller completes export formalities.
Container handed to buyer-nominated carrier; risk transfer can be evidenced here.
Buyer-controlled main carriage chain continues.
Buyer manages freight/import according to deal.
Scenario 2: seller pays freight to buyer's port but buyer takes transit risk earlier
A buyer asks for one freight-paid price to its destination port. The seller agrees to contract the main carriage, but the parties do not want seller risk to continue throughout the voyage. That commercial structure is the logic of C-rules.
For sea/vessel delivery it may point to CFR/CIF; for any-mode/containerized carriage it may point to CPT/CIP. The insurance question separates CFR from CIF and CPT from CIP, while the transport/handover structure helps choose the family.
Risk transfers at carrier/on-board delivery point.
Buyer bears transit risk after delivery point, subject to insurance/contract.
Seller continues paying contracted carriage to named destination.
Buyer handles import obligations under C rules.
Scenario 3: buyer wants a delivered price to its warehouse
A buyer asks the exporter to carry the shipment all the way to its warehouse. First decide whether the seller should unload. If not, DAP may fit. If seller must unload at the named destination, DPU is the rule that includes unloading in seller delivery.
Then ask who will import-clear and pay duties/taxes. If the buyer does, DAP/DPU can remain workable. DDP puts destination import obligations on the seller and should not be offered until the exporter has confirmed it can legally and operationally act that way in the destination country.
Choose the rule with six questions—not with habit
Do not start with ‘we always use FOB’. Start with the real movement and control. Answer the six questions below with the buyer/logistics team, then use the official ICC text when the contract matters.
- 1Where should seller risk end?
Premises, carrier/terminal, alongside/on-board vessel, or destination?
- 2Who controls main carriage?
Buyer booking points toward E/F; seller-paid freight can point toward C/D depending on risk endpoint.
- 3Is vessel delivery truly the handover?
If the container is handed to a carrier/terminal earlier, evaluate any-mode rules.
- 4Must seller arrange insurance?
CIP/CIF create rule-specific insurance obligations; other rules can still have separately agreed cover.
- 5Who unloads at destination?
Seller unloading points toward DPU.
- 6Who can legally import-clear?
Do not promise DDP until destination import/tax/registration feasibility is known.
Carry the exact rule and named place through costing and documents
Once the parties agree the rule, use the same rule/place in the internal costing, quotation, PO acceptance, pro forma/commercial invoice and logistics instructions. If the named place changes from port to inland warehouse, recalculate the commercial model; that can add transport, unloading or import-adjacent obligations.
Keep payment terms separate. ‘CIF, 30% advance and 70% against documents’ combines a delivery rule with a payment arrangement; neither replaces the other.
Primary references and current-source checks
Requirements, policies and platform guidance can change. Recheck these sources when the decision matters.
ICC — Incoterms® 2020 ↗